Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 19 (2):243-270 (1999)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/ojls/19.2.243
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,078
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Gender Neutrality, Rape and Trial Talk.Philip N. S. Rumney - 2008 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 21 (2):139-155.
The Wrong of Rape.David Archard - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
Rape Myths: Is Elite Opinion Right and Popular Opinion Wrong?Helen Reece - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):445-473.
Setting Penalties: What Does Rape Deserve? [REVIEW]Michael Davis - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):61 - 110.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-22

Total views
16 ( #662,576 of 2,498,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes