Vernünftige Existenz als Weltbewältigung. Eine Kritik der weltanschaulichen Neutralität säkularer Vernunft bei Jürgen Habermas


Since Jürgen Habermas' speech for the Peace Price of the German Book Trade in October 2001, secular reason – personified by one of its main protagonists – has been able to debate with religion anew. For the purpose of an unbiased encounter between philosophy and religion, Habermas introduced the term “postsecular” back then in order to emphasize that this dialogue was inevitably necessary, all the more in the face of religiously motivated terrorism. Nonetheless, this willingness to debate was accompanied by the conviction that secular reason itself, as a matter of fact, would be “ideologically neutral”. However, taking the necessity of accomplishing the confrontation with “world” (Weltbewältigung) seriously, the reflection on world view as a whole unveils its implied tasks of granting metaphysical and existential certainty (metaphysische Sicherheit), therefore resulting in the statement that there cannot be a neutral world view at all. Only dialogue as exchange of beliefs generates the general framework within which the discursive issues of world views are separated from their existential aspects, thus enabling a reasonably conducted debate without endangering the existential certainty of its participants. As a consequence, the neutrality of world views exclusively rests in dialogue and is no unique feature of secular reason at all. Eventually, this leads to the reconsideration of the conditions that must be given for an argument to be called “rational”. The article tries to point out that an argument in political contexts, whether given by a religious or a secular person, should only be acknowledged rational if it takes at least all living people – regardless of their group affiliations – into account.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Living in an Age of Comfort: Understanding Religion in the Twenty-first Century.G. Melleuish - 2014 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2014 (166):9-24.
Can We Afford to be “Post-Secular?”.Bill Cooke - 2013 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 21 (1):93-103.
A Religião E A Esfera Pública - Religion and Public Sphere.Julio Paulo T. Zabatiero - 2008 - Cadernos de Ética E Filosofia Política 12:139-159.
A Ordem Moral Moderna E A Política Do Secularismo.Luiz Bernardo Araujo - 2011 - [email protected] - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 10 (3):39-53.
The archaic and us: Ritual, myth, the sacred and modernity.Massimo Rosati - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (4-5):363-368.
A Postsecular Rationale – Religious and Secular as Epistemic Peers.Paolo Monti - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 3 (2).
Is Secularism Neutral?Rex Ahdar - 2013 - Ratio Juris 26 (3):404-429.


Added to PP

340 (#34,537)

6 months
82 (#12,068)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Maximilian Runge-Segelhorst
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations