David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):58-70 (2012)
In the study of politics, Cambridge is sometimes associated with a school of political philosophical “realism.” This article discusses what realism in political philosophy might mean, by examining first what might count as “unrealistic” political philosophy (looking at Sidgwick and Rawls), and then some recent attempts to identify a more realistic philosophical approach to politics. It argues that realistic political philosophy tends to emerge as a thin account of politics that falls between the stools of either more philosophical (i.e., more idealistic) or less philosophical (i.e., more historical) accounts. It illustrates this in relation to Sidgwick and also Hobbes, who is often held up as the quintessential realist in the history of political philosophy
|Keywords||representation legitimacy Rawls Sidgwick Hobbes realism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
John Rawls (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
Thomas Hobbes (2012). Leviathan. Clarendon Press.
John Rawls (2009). A Theory of Justice. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Citations of this work BETA
Enzo Rossi & Matt Sleat (2014). Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass 9 (10):689-701.
Sarah Fine (forthcoming). Migration, Political Philosophy, and the Real World. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-7.
Alexis Papazoglou (2012). Philosophy, Its Pitfalls, Some Rescue Plans, and Their Complications. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):2-19.
Similar books and articles
Enzo Rossi (2013). Consensus, Compromise, Justice and Legitimacy. Critical Review of Social and International Political Philosophy 16 (4):557-572.
C. A. J. Coady (2008). Messy Morality: The Challenge of Politics. Oxford University Press.
Edward Hall (2013). Political Realism and Fact-Sensitivity. Res Publica 19 (2):173-181.
Pedro Alexis Tabensky (2007). Realistic Idealism: An Aristotelian Alternative to Machiavellian International Relations. Theoria 54 (113):97-111.
D. Howard (2011). Why Study the History of Political Thought? Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):519-531.
Sebastiano Maffettone (2001). John Rawls. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):189-216.
Steven B. Smith (2012). Political Philosophy. Yale University Press.
David Hume (1994). Political Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Kevin M. Cherry (2012). Plato, Aristotle and the Purpose of Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Chantal Mouffe (2005). The Limits of John Rawls’s Pluralism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):221-231.
Andrew Sabl (2012). Hume's Politics: Coordination and Crisis in the History of England. Princeton University Press.
Enzo Rossi (2010). Reality and Imagination in Political Theory and Practice: On Raymond Geuss’s Realism. [REVIEW] European Journal of Political Theory 9 (4):504-512.
Added to index2012-01-06
Total downloads68 ( #71,663 of 1,924,749 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #211,945 of 1,924,749 )
How can I increase my downloads?