From Hacking’s Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to “Foliated” Pluralism: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism
Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1212-1222 (2011)
This essay aims at proposing a “philosophically important” form of scientific pluralism that captures essential features of contemporary scientific pratice largely ignored by the various forms of scientific pluralism currently discussed by philosophers. My starting point is Hacking’s concept of style of scentific reasoning, with a focus on its ontological import. I extend Hacking’s thesis by proposing the process of “ontological enrichment” to grasp how the objects created by a style articulate with the common objects of scientific inquiry “out there in the world”. The result is “foliated pluralism”, which puts to the fore the transdisciplinary and cumulative ways of proceeding in science, as well as the historical dimension of the genesis of scientific objects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
'Style' for Historians and Philosophers.Ian Hacking - 1992 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (1):1-20.
Citations of this work BETA
Towards Democratic Models of Science. Exploring the Case of Scientific Pluralism.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (2):149-172.
Overlapping Ontologies and Indigenous Knowledge. From Integration to Ontological Self-Determination.David Ludwig - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:36-45.
Similar books and articles
Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions.Mieke Boon - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.
Causal Pluralism and Scientific Knowledge: An Underexposed Problem.Leen De Vreese - 2006 - Philosophica 77.
Value Pluralism.Ruth Chang - 2015 - In James Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol. 25. Elsevier. pp. 21-26.
Pluralism × 3: Truth, Logic, Metaphysics.Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):259-277.
Restall and Beall on Logical Pluralism: A Critique.Manuel Bremer - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (2):293-299.
Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW]John Kelsay - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Pluralism, Indeterminacy and the Social Sciences: Reply to Ingram and Meehan. [REVIEW]James Bohman - 1997 - Human Studies 20 (4):441-458.
Theories, Practices, and Pluralism: A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science.James Bohman - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (4):459-480.
Peirce and Royce and the Betrayal of Science: Scientific Fraud and Misconduct.Jacquelyn Anne K. Kegley - 2010 - The Pluralist 5 (2):87-104.
Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2003 - Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
A Pragmatist Defense of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism in History and Social Science.Jeroen van Bouwel & Erik Weber - 2008 - History and Theory 47 (2):168–182.
Essay Review:Scientific Pluralism* Stephen H. Kellert , Helen E. Longino , and C. Kenneth Waters , Eds., Scientific Pluralism . Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (2006), Xxix+248 Pp., $50.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW]Jordi Cat - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):317-325.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads128 ( #36,919 of 2,158,842 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #86,693 of 2,158,842 )
How can I increase my downloads?