Ontology relativized: Reply to Moulines

Synthese 151 (3):325 - 330 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ontology is taken by Moulines as supervenient on science: what kinds of things there are is determined by our well-confirmed theories. But the fact is that today, science provides us with a multiplicity of well-confirmed theories, each having its own ontological commitments. The modest, ontological form of reduction advocated by Moulines (this volume) restores hope of putting some ontological order in the “huge chaotic supermarket of science”. In this paper I show that any claim on the amount of order obtained by reduction does not only always remain “temporally qualified” but, worse for the reductionist with a taste for ontological order, that the very notion of orderliness must be relativized to the capacities and interests of knowers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are there ontological explanations?Erik Weber - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):277-283.
Ontology, Reduction, and the Unity of Science.C. Ulises Moulines - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:19-27.
The Apparent Inconsistency of Moulines' Treatment of Equilibrium Thermodynamics.John H. Harris - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:304 - 311.
Foucault’s politicization of ontology.Johanna Oksala - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):445-466.
Does ontology exist?Hans-Johann Glock - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (2):235-260.
Contextual definition and ontological commitment.Dirk Greimann - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):357 – 373.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#286,150)

6 months
2 (#658,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?