Realization, completers, and Ceteris Paribus laws in psychology

Abstract
University of Colorado, Boulder If there are laws of psychology, they would seem to hold only ceteris paribus (c.p., hereafter), i.e., other things being equal. If a person wants that q and believes that doing a is the most efficient way to make it the case that q, then she will attempt to do a—but not, however, if she believes that a carries with it consequences much more hated than q is liked, or she believes she is incapable of doing a, or she gets distracted from her goal that q, or she suddenly has a severe brain hemorrhage, or.... No one can say precisely where the list ends, but the idea is supposed to be clear enough: normally the law holds, but there are many cases, exceptions, one might say, in which the law does not; the difficulty of characterizing these exceptions invites the qualification ‘c.p.’ as a catch-all
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axl029
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Unreality of Realization.Chase B. Wrenn - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):305-322.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
153 ( #31,713 of 2,193,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,277 of 2,193,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature