Barriers to Implication
In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan (2010)
Abstract
The formulation and proof of Hume’s Law and several related inference barrier theses.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Implication with possible exceptions.Herman Jurjus & Harrie de Swart - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):517-535.
Indexicals, context-sensitivity and the failure of implication.Gillian Russell - 2011 - Synthese 183 (2):143 - 160.
Editorial: Disability and accessibility in psychology: Three major barriers.Kenneth S. Pope - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):103 – 106.
Grafting modalities onto substructural implication systems.Marcello D'agostino, Dov M. Gabbay & Alessandra Russo - 1997 - Studia Logica 59 (1):65-102.
Some defninitions of subjunctive implication, of counterfactual implication, and of related concepts.Rolf Schock - 1961 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 2 (4):206-221.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
152 (#84,320)
6 months
6 (#132,607)
2009-01-28
Downloads
152 (#84,320)
6 months
6 (#132,607)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Remembering: Epistemic and Empirical.Carl F. Craver - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (2):261-281.
Why Friendly AIs won’t be that Friendly: A Friendly Reply to Muehlhauser and Bostrom.Robert James M. Boyles & Jeremiah Joven Joaquin - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (2):505–507.
On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law.Samuele Chilovi & Daniel Wodak - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):633-653.
