Barriers to Implication

In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The formulation and proof of Hume’s Law and several related inference barrier theses.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,554

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

174 (#93,828)

6 months
12 (#104,744)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gillian Russell
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

Remembering: Epistemic and Empirical.Carl F. Craver - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (2):261-281.
Truthmaking and the is—ought gap.Kit Fine - 2018 - Synthese 198 (2):887-914.
On the (in)significance of Hume’s Law.Samuele Chilovi & Daniel Wodak - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (2):633-653.
How to Prove Hume’s Law.Gillian Russell - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3):603-632.

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references