Human agricultural economy is, and likely always was, largely based on kinship. Why?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:34-35 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Commentary on J. Gowdy & L. Krall "The economic origins of ultrasociality": We question the sequence of evolutionary transitions leading to ultrasociality in humans proposed by Gowdy & Krall. Evidence indicates that families are, and likely always have been, the primary productive units in human agricultural economies, suggesting that genetic relatedness is key to understanding when the suppression of individual autonomy to the benefit of subsistence groups, i.e. extended families, evolved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The economic origins of ultrasociality.John Gowdy & Lisi Krall - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-63.
Agricultural structure and economic adjustment.E. Wesley & F. Peterson - 1986 - Agriculture and Human Values 3 (4):6-15.
Problems of agricultural policy in East Germany.Leila Lueschen - 1993 - Agriculture and Human Values 10 (1):27-39.
Agricultural real estate loans and secondary markets.David B. Pariser - 1987 - Agriculture and Human Values 4 (2-3):29-39.
Greek agriculture in a period of adjustment.Leonidas C. Polopolus - 1989 - Agriculture and Human Values 6 (1-2):82-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-25

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Cooperation, Culture, and Conflict.Kim Sterelny - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (1):31-58.

Add more references