Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):422-423 (2007)

Authors
Brian Huss
York University
Kristin Andrews
York University
Abstract
Our concern is with Ramsey et al.'s method for identifying innovation. We show that either it yields false positives or the authors offer insufficient guidance for its application. To avoid these results, the authors need to modify the key or offer better guidelines for delineating input. Either choice requires addressing the processes that generate a behavior
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X07002531
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,291
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Innovation and Creativity in Forest-Living Rehabilitant Orangutans.Anne E. Russon - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Environmental Variability and Primate Behavioural Flexibility.Simon M. Reader & Katharine MacDonald - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Novelty in Deceit.Richard W. Byrne - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Animal Innovation: An Introduction.Kevin N. Laland & Simon M. Reader - 2003 - In Simon M. Reader & Kevin N. Laland (eds.), Animal Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
74 ( #146,846 of 2,456,092 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,366 of 2,456,092 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes