Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (30) (2018)
Abstract |
Theories of face recognition in cognitive psychology stipulate that the hallmark of accurate identification is the ability to recognize a person consistently, across different encounters. In this study, we apply this reasoning to eyewitness identification by assessing the recognition of the same target person repeatedly, over six successive lineups. Such repeat identifications are challenging and can be performed only by a proportion of individuals, both when a target exhibits limited and more substantial variability in appearance across lineups. The ability to do so correlates with individual differences in identification accuracy on two established tests of unfamiliar face recognition. This indicates that most observers have limited facial representations of target persons in eyewitness scenarios, which do not allow for robust identification in most individuals, partly due to limitations in their ability to recognize unfamiliar faces. In turn, these findings suggest that consistency of responses across multiple lineups of faces could be applied to assess which individuals are accurate eyewitnesses.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1186/s41235-018-0121-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Distributed Human Neural System for Face Perception.Elizabeth A. Hoffman, M. Ida Gobbini & James V. Haxby - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (6):223-233.
Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances.A. Mike Burton, Robin S. S. Kramer, Kay L. Ritchie & Rob Jenkins - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (1):202-223.
Variability in Photos of the Same Face.Rob Jenkins, David White, Xandra Van Montfort & A. Mike Burton - 2011 - Cognition 121 (3):313-323.
Verification of Face Identities From Images Captured on Video.Vicki Bruce, Zoë Henderson, Karen Greenwood, Peter J. B. Hancock, A. Mike Burton & Paul Miller - 1999 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 (4):339.
Matching Faces to Photographs: Poor Performance in Eyewitness Memory.Ahmed M. Megreya & A. Mike Burton - 2008 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (4):364-372.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Who Can Recognize Unfamiliar Faces? Individual Differences and Observer Consistency in Person Identification.Markus Bindemann, Meri Avetisyan & Tim Rakow - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (3):277-291.
Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis of Eyewitness Memory: Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Simultaneous Versus Sequential Lineups.Laura Mickes, Heather D. Flowe & John T. Wixted - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 18 (4):361-376.
Eyewitness Confidence in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups: A Criterion Shift Account for Sequential Mistaken Identification Overconfidence.David G. Dobolyi & Chad S. Dodson - 2013 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 19 (4):345-357.
Face Recognition in Eyewitness Memory.R. C. L. Lindsay, Jamal K. Mansour, Michelle I. Bertrand, Natalie Kalmet & Elisabeth I. Melsom - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press.
Individual Differences in the Detection, Matching and Memory of Faces.Matthew Fysh - 2018 - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (20).
Unfamiliar Face Perception.A. Mike Burton & Rob Jenkins - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 287--306.
Explaining Person Identification: An Inquiry Into the Tracking of Human Agents.Nicolas J. Bullot - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (4):567-584.
Fast and Confident: Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in a Field Study.Melanie Sauerland & Siegfried L. Sporer - 2009 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 15 (1):46-62.
Forensic Face Matching: A Review.C. Fysh Matthew & Markus Bindemann - 2017 - In Markus Bindemann & Ahmed M. Megreya (eds.), Face processing: Systems, Disorders and Cultural Differences. New York: Nova Science Publishing Inc.. pp. 1-20.
Sad People Are More Accurate at Face Recognition Than Happy People.Peter J. Hills, Magda A. Werno & Michael B. Lewis - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1502-1517.
Accuracy of Familiarity Decisions to Famous Faces Perceived Without Awareness Depends on Attitude to the Target Person and on Response Latency.Anna Stone & Tim Valentine - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):351-376.
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt?: Reconsidering Uncorroborated Eyewitness Identification Testimony.Sandra Guerra Thompson - manuscript
Angry Faces Are Tracked More Easily Than Neutral Faces During Multiple Identity Tracking.Jie Li, Lauri Oksama, Lauri Nummenmaa & Jukka Hyönä - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (3):464-479.
The Confidence-Accuracy Relationship in Eyewitness Identification: Effects of Lineup Instructions, Foil Similarity, and Target-Absent Base Rates.Neil Brewer & Gary L. Wells - 2006 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12 (1):11-30.
Identity From Variation: Representations of Faces Derived From Multiple Instances.A. Mike Burton, Robin S. S. Kramer, Kay L. Ritchie & Rob Jenkins - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (1):202-223.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-08
Total views
2 ( #1,372,691 of 2,411,828 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,828 )
2018-09-08
Total views
2 ( #1,372,691 of 2,411,828 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,761 of 2,411,828 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads