Authors
Paul Rusnock
University of Ottawa
Abstract
This essay presents a new interpretation of Bolzano's account of necessary truth as set out in ?182 of the Theory of Science. According to this interpretation, Bolzano's conception is closely related to that of Leibniz, with some important differences. In the first place, Bolzano's conception of necessary truth embraces not only what Leibniz called metaphysical or brute necessities but also moral necessities (truths grounded in God's choice of the best among all metaphysical possibilities). Second, in marked contrast to Leibniz, Bolzano maintains that there is still plenty of room for contingency even on this broader conception of necessity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2012.679783
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,750
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Paradoxien des Unendlichen.Bernard Bolzano - 2012 - Felix Meiner Verlag.
Wissenschaftslehre. [REVIEW]Arthur R. Schweitzer - 2001 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (18):134-136.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bolzano on the Source of Necessity: A Reply to Rusnock.Mark Textor - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):381 - 392.
Collections in Early Bolzano.Stefania Centrone & Mark Siebel - 2018 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 6 (7).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant and Bolzano on Logical Form.Paul Rusnock - 2011 - Kant-Studien 102 (4):477-491.
On Bolzano's Concept of a Sum.Paul Rusnock - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):155 - 169.
Logical and Metaphysical Assumptions of Bernard Bolzano's Theodicy.Dariusz Łukasiewicz - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (1):33 - 56.
Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence.Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.
Mere Possibilities - Bolzano's Account of Non-Actual Objects.Benjamin Schnieder - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):525-550.
Bolzano Versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis.Paola Cantù - 2011 - Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
Are Bolzano’s Substances Simple?Andrej Krause - 2006 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-14

Total views
34 ( #311,800 of 2,438,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #436,491 of 2,438,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes