Critical Horizons 15 (3):211-230 (2014)

Matheson Russell
University of Auckland
Against the enthusiasm for dialogue and deliberation in recent democratic theory, the Italian philosopher Roberto Esposito and French philosopher Jacques Rancière construct their political philosophies around the nondialogical figure of the third person. The strikingly different deployments of the figure of the third person offered by Esposito and Rancière present a crystallization of their respective approaches to political philosophy. In this essay, the divergent analyses of the third person offered by these two thinkers are considered in terms of the critical strategies they employ. Contrasting Esposito’s strategy of “ethical dissensus” with Rancière’s strategy of “aesthetic dissensus,” it is argued that Esposito’s attempts to recruit the figure of the third person to dismantle the dispositif of the person are politically problematic, while Rancière’s alternative account of the third person is more promising for political theory and practice.
Keywords Rancière  Esposito  third person  the impersonal  dissensus  democracy  the political subject
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1179/1440991714z.00000000032
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.David M. Rasmussen - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (173):571.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Merging Second-Person and First-Person Neuroscience.Matthew R. Longo & Manos Tsakiris - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):429-430.
How to Do Things with Rancière.Matthew Lampert - 2017 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 9 (1):96-106.
Jacques Rancière and the Problem of Pure Politics.Samuel A. Chambers - 2011 - European Journal of Political Theory 10 (3):303-326.
Ranciere Now.Oliver Davis - 2013 - Polity.
Sensibility and the Law: On Rancière's Reading of Lyotard.Peter Milne - 2011 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 15 (2):95-119.
Reasons and Oughts.David Barnet Conter - 1983 - Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)


Added to PP index

Total views
533 ( #13,057 of 2,439,695 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #16,405 of 2,439,695 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes