Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):121-139 (1989)

Authors
Bruce Russell
Wayne State University
Abstract
In this paper I consider several versions of the argument from evil against the existence of a God who is omniscient, omnipotent and wholly good and raise some objections to them. Then I offer my own version of the argument from evil that says that if God exists, nothing happens that he should have prevented from happening and that he should have prevented the brutal rape and murder of a certain little girl if he exists. Since it was not prevented, God does not exist. My conclusion rests on the claim that no outweighing good was served by allowing that murder, or any other instance of comparable evil, to occur. I take up the objection that my argument moves illicitly from apparently pointless suffering to the claim that there is reason to believe that there is pointless suffering. I offer an example to show that the existence of apparently pointless suffering counts to some extent against the existence of God and to show that no basic belief that God exists that rests on certain sorts of grounds can remain justified in the face of apparently pointless suffering
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil19896221
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Evil.Richard Swinburne - 1982 - In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Contemporary Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments From Evil.Michael J. Almeida & Graham Oppy - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):496 – 516.
Skeptical Theism.Justin McBrayer - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Epistemic Humility, Arguments From Evil, and Moral Skepticism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 2:17-57.
The Normatively Relativised Logical Argument From Evil.John Bishop & Ken Perszyk - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (2):109-126.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logical Problem of Evil.James R. Beebe - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Vagueness and Pointless Evil.Michael Schrynemakers - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:245-254.
The Argument From Evil.Andrea M. Weisberger - 2007 - In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CORNEA, Scepticism and Evil.Jim Stone - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):59-70.
Against Multiverse Theodicies.Bradley Monton - 2010 - Philo 13 (2):113-135.
The Problem of Infant Suffering.Andrew Chignell - 1998 - Religious Studies 34 (2):205-217.
Theism and Modal Collapse.Klaas J. Kraay - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):361.
Does Skeptical Theism Lead to Moral Skepticism?Jeff Jordan - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):403 - 417.
Peter Van Inwagen on the Problem of Evil.William L. Rowe - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):425-431.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
259 ( #39,067 of 2,463,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #53,478 of 2,463,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes