Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):601-612 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
This paper explores the limitations of epistemic scientism for understanding the role the concept of race plays in assisted reproductive technology practices. Two major limitations centre around the desire to use scientific knowledge to bring about social improvement. In the first case, undue focus is placed on debunking the scientific reality of racial categories and characteristics. The alternative to this approach is to focus instead on the way the race idea functions in ART practices. Doing so reveals how the race idea helps to define the reproductive “problems” different groups of women are experiencing and to dictate when and how they should be “helped”; helps to resolve tensions about who should be considered the real parents of children produced by reproductive technologies; and is used to limit ART use where that use threatens to denaturalize the very sociopolitical landscape the race idea has created. In the second case, scientific knowledge regarding reproduction is thought to call for technological control over that reproduction. This leads to an overemphasis on personal responsibility and a depoliticization of racialized social inequalities
Keywords Race  Assisted reproductive technologies  Epistemic scientism  Technology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-015-9663-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Ethics Along the Color Line.Anna Stubblefield - 2018 - Cornell University Press.
Six Signs of Scientism.Susan Haack - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (1):75-95.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bioethics and Epistemic Scientism.Christopher Mayes, Claire Hooker & Ian Kerridge - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):565-567.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Scientism Epistemically Vicious?Ian James Kidd - 2017 - In Jeroen de Ridder, Rik Peels & René van Woudenberg (eds.), Scientism: Prospects and Problems. Oxford University Press. pp. 222-249.
The Limits of Liberal Choice:Racial Selection and Reprogenetics.Camisha Russell - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (s1):97-108.
Knowledge, Bodies, and Values: Reproductive Technologies and Their Scientific Context.Helen E. Longino - 1992 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 35 (3-4):323 – 340.
What Can Progress in Reproductive Technology Mean for Women?L. M. Purdy - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (5):499-514.
Copula: Sexual Technologies, Reproductive Powers.Robyn Ferrell - 2006 - State University of New York Press.
The New Reproductive Technologies: Defying God's Dominion?Maura Anne Ryan - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):419-438.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-12-01

Total views
28 ( #405,728 of 2,498,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,341 of 2,498,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes