A non-classical logical foundation for naturalised realism

In P. & M. Danćak Arazim (ed.), Logica Yearbook 2014. College Publications. pp. 249-266 (2015)

Abstract

In this paper, by suggesting a formal representation of science based on recent advances in logic-based Artificial Intelligence (AI), we show how three serious concerns around the realisation of traditional scientific realism (the theory/observation distinction, over-determination of theories by data, and theory revision) can be overcome such that traditional realism is given a new guise as ‘naturalised’. We contend that such issues can be dealt with (in the context of scientific realism) by developing a formal representation of science based on the application of the following tools from Knowledge Representation: the family of Description Logics, an enrichment of classical logics via defeasible statements, and an application of the preferential interpretation of the approach to Belief Revision.

Download options

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-27

Downloads
157 (#76,879)

6 months
7 (#102,242)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Re-Enchanting Realism in Debate with Kyle Stanford.Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):201-224.
Is Transparent Intensional Logic a Non-Classical Logic?Pavel Materna - 2014 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 23 (1):47-55.
Repositioning Realism.Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem - 2015 - Philosophia Scientae 19:85-98.
Is Logic in the Mind or in the World?Gila Sher - 2011 - Synthese 181 (2):353 - 365.
Against Logical Realism.Michael D. Resnik - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):181-194.
Realisms. Temporal and Spatial.Zdzisław Augustynek - 1995 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 3:3-22.