Reviewing Reduction in a Preferential Model‐Theoretic Context

Authors
Emma Ruttkamp-Bloem
University of Pretoria
Abstract
In this article, we redefine classical notions of theory reduction in such a way that model-theoretic preferential semantics becomes part of a realist depiction of this aspect of science. We offer a model-theoretic reconstruction of science in which theory succession or reduction is often better - or at a finer level of analysis - interpreted as the result of model succession or reduction. This analysis leads to 'defeasible reduction', defined as follows: The conjunction of the assumptions of a reducing theory T with the definitions translating the vocabulary of a reduced theory T' to the vocabulary of T, defeasibly entails the assumptions of reduced T'. This relation of defeasible reduction offers, in the context of additional knowledge becoming available, articulation of a more flexible kind of reduction in theory development than in the classical case. Also, defeasible reduction is shown to solve the problems of entailment that classical homogeneous reduction encounters. Reduction in the defeasible sense is a practical device for studying the processes of science, since it is about highlighting different aspects of the same theory at different times of application, rather than about naive dreams concerning a metaphysical unity of science.
Keywords theory reduction  scientific realism  model succession  preferential logic  classical logic  defeasible reduction
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/02698590500249431
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reduction and Genetics.David L. Hull - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):125-144.
Is Functional Reduction Logical Reduction?Max Kistler - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (14):219-234.
Kim on Reduction.Ausonio Marras - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (2):231-57.
Approaches to Reduction.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):137-147.
Nagelian Reduction Beyond the Nagel Model.Raphael van Riel - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):353-375.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
60 ( #113,839 of 2,312,953 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #340,573 of 2,312,953 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature