Phronesis 50 (1):43 - 55 (2005)
Two texts that raise problems for Alexander of Aphrodisias' theory of universals are examined. "De anima" 90.2-8 appears to suggest that universals are dependent on thought for their existence; this raises questions about the status both of universals and of forms. It is suggested that the passage is best interpreted as indicating that universals are dependent on thought only for their being recognised as universals. The last sentence of "Quaestio" 1.11 seems to assert that if the universal did not exist no individual would exist, thereby contradicting Alexander's position elsewhere. This seems to be a slip resulting from the fact that species with only one member are the exception rather than the rule
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Les sources post-hellénistiques du questionnaire de Porphyre.Gweltaz Guyomarc’H. - 2013 - Methodos 13.
Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.Miira Tuominen - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):852-895.
Similar books and articles
The Operator Theory of Instantiation.Peter Forrest - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):213 – 228.
Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden's Ontology.Ingvar Johansson - 2009 - Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87.
Boethius Against Universals: The Arguments in the Second Commentary on Porphyry.Paul Vincent Spade - manuscript
Platonism and the Invention of the Problem of Universals.Lloyd Gerson - 2004 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (3):233-256.
Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and Its Problems.Riin Sirkel - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #209,427 of 2,163,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,043 of 2,163,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?