Alexander of Aphrodisias on universals: two problematic texts

Phronesis 50 (1):43 - 55 (2005)
Abstract
Two texts that raise problems for Alexander of Aphrodisias' theory of universals are examined. "De anima" 90.2-8 appears to suggest that universals are dependent on thought for their existence; this raises questions about the status both of universals and of forms. It is suggested that the passage is best interpreted as indicating that universals are dependent on thought only for their being recognised as universals. The last sentence of "Quaestio" 1.11 seems to assert that if the universal did not exist no individual would exist, thereby contradicting Alexander's position elsewhere. This seems to be a slip resulting from the fact that species with only one member are the exception rather than the rule
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/1568528053066979
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,810
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Philosophy of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle.Miira Tuominen - 2012 - Philosophy Compass 7 (12):852-895.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
24 ( #218,175 of 2,202,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,722 of 2,202,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature