Argumentation 6 (3):291-296 (1992)

The first part of this paper contends that argumentation is central and essential to Aristotle's Rhetoric, and recounts a number of arguments in support of that view, particularly the recognition that deliberative rhetoric or the rhetoric of counsel is the primary concern of Aristotle's work. The second part of the paper reviews the work that follows in this present volume to show that the other writers' views fit in perfectly with this thesis
Keywords argumentation  the rhetoric of counsel  deliberative rhetoric  enthymeme  example (paradigm)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00154694
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.
Aristotle's Theory of Rhetorical Argumentation.Jean Dietz Moss - 1986 - Review of Metaphysics 40 (2):395-397.
Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 2004 - In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 569--588.


Added to PP index

Total views
31 ( #368,315 of 2,506,004 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,828 of 2,506,004 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes