Newer than what? Older than what?

Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (1):1-15 (2007)
The essay approaches the question: Older Than What; Newer Than What? as naively as possible; it begins by asking whether there can be, and perhaps was, liberalism before the word was coined, and argues that there could have been but as a matter of fact was not. It then changes tack to ask whether liberalism is in essence a modern phenomenon, and answers that it is. This, however, raises the further question of what, if anything, lends coherence to modern forms of liberalism. The paper then argues that, contrary to Rawls, it is a comprehensive, or more narrowly ‘autonomist,’ conception of liberalism that provides the only reliable basis in ethics, metaphysics, and in a view of human nature for more limited forms of liberalism. It is argued throughout that liberalism so construed is a contentious creed, and that liberals should not be daunted by that fact.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S026505250707001X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,472
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Liberalism, Religion And Integrity.Kevin Vallier - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
Hayek and Modern Liberalism.Chandran Kukathas - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
Justice and Restrain.João Cardoso Rosas - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:153-157.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice.Michael Sandel - 2003 - In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University. pp. 336-343.
Conceptions of the Good and the Ubiquity of Power.Sean Johnston - 2010 - Social Philosophy Today 26:83-90.
Is Liberalism Strong Enough for a Moral Consensus?John Wilson - 1990 - Journal of Moral Education 19 (1):24-32.
Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Civic Virtue.Herlinde Pauer-studer - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (3):174 – 192.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
13 ( #380,449 of 2,210,885 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #356,854 of 2,210,885 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature