Comment on Mr. Achinstein's Paper

Analysis 21 (1):9 - 11 (1960)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/21.1.9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Discussion Note: Positive Relevance Defended.Sherrilyn Roush - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (1):110-116.
Restoring Ambiguity to Achinstein's Account of Evidence.Steven Gimbel - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):269-285.
Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories & Applications.P. Achinstein (ed.) - 2005 - The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Carnap and Achinstein on Evidence.Frederick M. Kronz - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 67 (2):151 - 167.
Barker and Achinstein on Goodman.Gary Sollazzo - 1972 - Philosophical Studies 23 (1-2):91 - 97.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

69 ( #77,062 of 2,177,962 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,962 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums