Dissertation, University of Western Ontario (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Since the 1980’s, surrogacy has become a popular reproductive alternative for individuals experiencing infertility. The ethical and legal analyses of surrogacy have been rich and varied. Some bioethicists have charged the commercial surrogacy industry with the exploitation of global southern women or with the impermissible commodification of children and women’s reproductive capacities. Others have praised the potential for economic empowerment and bodily autonomy that surrogacy may accord to women. However, throughout these explorations of the ethics of surrogacy, comparatively little attention has been paid to the moral status of a crucial actor: the fertility doctor. Without doctors willing to provide prenatal and postnatal care to surrogates and make use of assisted reproductive technologies, commercial surrogacy would not take place. Yet, doctors’ involvement in surrogacy is far from morally neutral. In my thesis, I aim to explore what duties doctors have in the context of commercial surrogacy. To do so, I take up the framework of fiduciary obligation. I argue that doctors have fiduciary obligations to surrogates, and that these obligations shape if and when doctors can ethically facilitate surrogacy. My thesis is divided into four chapters. The first defends the view that the doctor-patient relationship is fiduciary in nature. The second chapter extends this view to the realm of commercial surrogacy, arguing that doctors also owe the surrogates they treat fiduciary obligations. The third chapter addresses a challenge posed by my view, namely that surrogacy seems to place doctors in positions where they constantly face conflicts of interest, and are therefore unable to uphold their fiduciary duty of loyalty to surrogates. I address this concern by arguing that conflicts of interest are not inherent in surrogacy, but that surrogacy arrangements must be substantially rethought in order to safeguard the doctor-surrogate fiduciary relationship. The final chapter considers the obligations doctors have to the children they help create through surrogacy and through assisted reproduction more generally.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe.Richard Holton - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):63 – 76.
For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
View all 50 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking “Commercial” Surrogacy in Australia.Jenni Millbank - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):477-490.
Surrogacy: Donor Conception Regulation in Japan.Chiungfang Chang Yukari Semba - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):348-357.
Surrogacy: Donor Conception Regulation in Japan.Yukari Semba, Chiungfang Chang, Hyunsoo Hong, Ayako Kamisato & Minori Kokado - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (8):348-357.
The Patient‐Worker: A Model for Human Research Subjects and Gestational Surrogates.Emma Ryman & Katy Fulfer - 2018 - Developing World Bioethics 18 (4):310-320.
“Surrogacy Has Been One of the Most Rewarding Experiences in My Life”: A Content Analysis of Blogs by U.S. Commercial Gestational Surrogates.Nicole F. Bromfield - 2016 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 9 (1):192-217.
The Exploitation Argument Against Commercial Surrogacy.Stephen Wilkinson - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (2):169–187.
Transnational Comercial Surrogacy in India: Gifts for Global Sisters?Amrita Pande - 2012 - Reproductive Biomedicine 23 (5):618-625.
Care Ethics and the Global Practice of Commercial Surrogacy.Jennifer A. Parks - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):333-340.
Is There a Right to Surrogacy?Christine Straehle - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (3):n/a-n/a.
Is There a Right to Surrogacy?Christine Straehle - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):146-159.
Merit and Money: The Situated Ethics of Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in Thailand.Andrea Whittaker - 2014 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 7 (2):100-120.
Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby‐Selling?R. Jo Kornegay - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):45-50.
Representations of Surrogacy in Submissions to a Parliamentary Inquiry in New South Wales.Damien W. Riggs & Clemence Due - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):71-84.
Exploitation in International Paid Surrogacy Arrangements.Stephen Wilkinson - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (2):125-145.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-08-20
Total views
11 ( #790,505 of 2,401,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,581 )
2017-08-20
Total views
11 ( #790,505 of 2,401,581 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,581 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads