Authors |
|
Abstract |
One finds, even in texts by distinguished physicists, diverse enunciations of the correspondence principle. Typical is that quantum mechanics should agree with classical mechanics in some appropriate limit. Most commonly, the limit specified is that of high quantum numbers, or of large masses and orbits of large dimensions. But sometimes it is specified as mean behavior when large numbers quanta are involved, or sometimes even as just the average of quantum mechanical variables. Sometimes, the principle is even taken as a prescription for replacing the classical dynamical observables with an appropriate mathematical operator. In 1918, however, Bohr proposed what he would later call the correspondence principle as a way of deriving amplitudes and polarizations of emitted and absorbed spectral lines. I will begin with Bohr's principle and trace the evolution of correspondence considerations through the 1920's, with a view as to whether in each case it is supposed to play the role of a theorem, an adequacy constraint, an inductive hypothesis or a heuristic.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism.Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
On the Verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the Correspondence Principle.Anthony Duncan & Michel Janssen - unknown
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
From Correspondence to Complementarity: The Emergence of Bohr's Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Scott Daniel Tanona - 2002 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Bohr Correspondence Principle for Large Quantum Numbers.Richard L. Liboff - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (2):271-293.
Why We Don’T Need Quantum Planetary Dynamics: Decoherence and the Correspondence Principle for Chaotic Systems.Wojciech Zurek & Juan Paz - 1999 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:167-177.
Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle.Hans Radder - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
Idealization and Formalism in Bohr’s Approach to Quantum Theory.Scott Tanona - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):683-695.
Atoms, Metaphors, and Paradoxes: Niels Bohr and the Construction of a New Physics.Sandro Petruccioli - 2006 - Cambridge University Press.
Re-Formulating The Generalized Correspondence Principle.Michael Shaffer - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):99-115.
On the Verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the Correspondence Principle.Anthony Duncan & Michel Janssen - unknown
The Quantitative Epistemological Content of Bohr's Correspondence Principle.Arthur Komar - 1970 - Synthese 21 (1):83 - 92.
Modeling High-Temperature Superconductors: Correspondence at Bay?Stephan Hartmann - 2008 - In Lena Soler (ed.), Rethinking Scientific Change. Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? Springer. pp. 107--128.
Bohr’s Philosophy in the Light of Peircean Pragmatism.Reza Maleeh - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):3-21.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-09-07
Total views
31 ( #333,678 of 2,411,838 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,282 of 2,411,838 )
2015-09-07
Total views
31 ( #333,678 of 2,411,838 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,282 of 2,411,838 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads