Bioethics 29 (7):451-461 (2015)

Reigning regulatory frameworks for biomedical research impose on researchers and research ethics committees an obligation to protect research participants from risks that are unnecessary, disproportionate to potential research benefits, and non-minimized. Where the research has no potential to produce results of direct benefit to the subjects and the subjects are unable to give consent, these requirements are strengthened by an additional condition, that risks should not exceed a certain minimal threshold. In this article, I address the question of whether there should be limits of permissible risks in non-therapeutic research involving competent and healthy subjects. Some commentators argue that competent and informed individuals should have a right to participate even in extremely risky research and that research ethics committees should never reject studies because they are too dangerous. To use David Shaw's expression, competent volunteers should have ‘a right to participate in high-risk research’. I argue that this idea is ill-founded, as it does not take into account the social mission and complex collaborative nature of research practice as well as the inequity of power between researchers and subjects. Imposition of limits on permissible risks for healthy volunteers is justified by the need to protect research enterprise and the need to protect the weaker party, namely the subjects. Also, I suggest that the best way to set boundaries on research risks is to leave the judgment of risk acceptability to research ethics committees.
Keywords healthy volunteers  risk/benefit assessment  autonomy  exploitation  high‐risk research
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12146
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Taking the Principle of the Primacy of the Human Being Seriously.Joanna Różyńska - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 24 (4):547-562.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Limits on Risks for Healthy Volunteers in Biomedical Research.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2):137-149.
Limits to Research Risks.F. G. Miller & S. Joffe - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (7):445-449.
The Right to Participate in High-Risk Research.David Shaw - 2014 - The Lancet 38:1009 – 1011.
Can Informed Consent to Research Be Adapted to Risk?Danielle Bromwich & Annette Rid - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (7):521-528.
De Minimis Risk: A Proposal for a New Category of Research Risk.Abraham Schwab - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (11):1-7.
The Concept of Risk and Responsible Conduct of Research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
Understanding Risks and Benefits in Research on Reproductive Genetic Technologies.Janet Malek - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (4):339 – 358.
Making Risk-Benefit Assessments of Medical Research Protocols.Alex Rajczi - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):338-348.


Added to PP index

Total views
26 ( #436,470 of 2,498,789 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,789 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes