David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 24 (1-2):5-28 (2001)
This paper examines the relation or, more precisely, tension between postmodern deconstruction and ethics by elaborating upon the ethico-political dimensions of deconstructionism. It embarks on a critical assessment of postmodern discourse on ethics in view of its political implications by analyzing Jacques Derrida''s and Richard Rorty''s arguments with an assumption that their positions represent a certain logic in the postmodern discourse on ethics. Postmodern ethics is based on incredulity with regard to traditional metanarratives, and it defines ethics in terms of sensitivity or responsibility to otherness and difference. Its proponents believe that the negation of modern metanarratives opens a way to the Other which has been marginalized and suppressed both in thought and in social practice. Derrida and Rorty represent this position with their emphasis on the ethical nature of deconstruction and the need to elaborate new languages for ethics. Despite postmodern appeal to ethics of this sort, however, postmodern thinking shows its limits in dealing with most ethical-political matters in the contemporary world. The postmodern approach to ethics, being restricted within the perspective of the individual, does not provide any determinate framework for deciding how to adjudicate conflicting ethical claims or how to link the unconditional affirmation of emancipatory ideals, enlightened social criticism, and democratic accountability in determinate political terms. In the main, this paper contends that philosophical deconstruction and responsibility to otherness undermine each other in the public sphere.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Modern Philosophy Philosophy of the Social Sciences Political Philosophy Sociolinguistics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard Rorty (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Jacques Derrida (1998). Of Grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
R. Rorty (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.
Jacques Derrida (1978). Writing and Difference. University of Chicago Press.
Jacques Derrida (2004). Positions. Continuum.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Marguerite La Caze (2007). At the Intersection: Kant, Derrida, and the Relation Between Ethics and Politics. Political Theory 35 (6):781 - 805.
Mark Dooley (2001). The Civic Religion of Social Hope: A Reply to Simon Critchley. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (5):35-58.
Stephen K. White (1991). Political Theory and Postmodernism. Cambridge University Press.
Georges de Schrijver (2010). The Political Ethics of Jean-François Lyotard and Jacques Derrida. Peeters.
Robert Hood (1998). Rorty and Postmodern Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 20 (2):183-193.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #221,757 of 1,902,964 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #446,009 of 1,902,964 )
How can I increase my downloads?