Authors
Bradford Saad
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
Interactionists hold that non-spatial objects causally interact with physical objects. Interactionists have traditionally grappled with the puzzle of how such interaction is possible. More recently, Jaegwon Kim has presented interactionists with a more daunting threat: the pairing argument, which purports to refute interactionism by showing that non-spatial objects cannot stand in causal relations. After reviewing that argument, I develop a challenge to it on behalf of the interactionist. The challenge poses a dilemma: roughly, either haecceities exist or they do not. I argue that the pairing argument fails in either case. While the challenge does not explain exactly how the pairing argument goes wrong, it shows that the argument fails. The challenge also explains the difficulty in pinpointing the pairing argument’s failure: exactly how the pairing argument fails depends on difficult issues concerning the nature of objects.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1314225
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 57,077
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Physicalism, or Something Near Enough.Jaegwon Kim - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):306-310.
The Identity of Indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.
The Nature of Laws.Michael Tooley - 1977 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):667-98.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Interactionism for the discerning mind?Derek Shiller - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (4):931-946.
Two solutions to the neural discernment problem.Bradford Saad - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (10):2837-2850.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Interactionism and Physicality.Eugene Mills - 1997 - Ratio 10 (2):169-83.
Dualism and the Argument From Continuity.Eric Russert Kraemer & Charles Sayward - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 37 (January):55-59.
Objectivism and Interactionism.Joseph Margolis - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (June):118-123.
Haecceities and Mathematical Structuralism.Christopher Menzel - 2018 - Philosophia Mathematica:84-111.
Haecceities and Perceptual Identification.Gary Rosenkrantz - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9 (1):107-119.
Haecceities and Perceptual Identification.Gary Rosenkrantz - 1979 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 9 (1):107-119.
The Roots of “Radical Interactionism”.Lonnie Athens - 2009 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 39 (4):387-414.
Kim Against Dualism.David Jehle - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (3):565-78.
The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. [REVIEW]Francis Baumli - 1979 - International Studies in Philosophy 11:201-202.
The Self and Its Brain. An Argument for Interactionism.K. R. Popper & J. C. Eccles - 1980 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 42 (3):629-630.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-19

Total views
62 ( #160,903 of 2,411,342 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #244,435 of 2,411,342 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes