Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (2):292-308 (2016)

Whole genome and exome sequencing techniques raise hope for a new scale of diagnosis, prevention, and prediction of genetic conditions, and improved care for children. For these hopes to materialize, extensive genomic research with children will be needed. However, the use of WGS/WES in pediatric research settings raises considerable challenges for families, researchers, and policy development. In particular, the possibility that these techniques will generate genetic findings unrelated to the primary goal of sequencing has stirred intense debate about whether, which, how, and when these secondary or incidental findings should be returned to parents and minors. The debate is even more pronounced when the subjects are adolescents, for whom decisions about return of SFs may have particular implications. In this paper, we consider the rise of “genomic citizenship” and the main challenges that arise for these stakeholders: adolescents' involvement in decisions relating to return of genomic SFs, the types of SFs that should be offered, privacy protections, and communication between researchers and adolescents about SFs. We argue that adolescents' involvement in genomic SF-related decisions acknowledges their status as valuable stakeholders without detracting from broader familial interests, and promotes more informed genomic citizens.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1073110516654123
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Precision Medicine Nation.Maya Sabatello & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (4):19-29.
Psychiatric Genomics and Public Mental Health in the Young Mind.Maya Sabatello - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (4):27-29.
A Genomically Informed Education System? Challenges for Behavioral Genetics.Maya Sabatello - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (1):130-144.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Support for Full Disclosure Up Front.Felicitas Holzer & Ignacio Mastroleo - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (1):3-3.
Genomic Testing and Genomic Care: Are They Talking to Each Other?Julian Barwell & Anirudh Kumar - 2015 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (6).
Genomic Research Data: Open Vs. Restricted Access.David B. Resnik - 2010 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 32 (1):1.
Genomic Programs as Mechanism Schemas: A Non-Reductionist Interpretation.Tudor M. Baetu - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):649-671.
The Ethics Weathervane.Bartha Maria Knoppers & Ruth Chadwick - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-5.
Genomic Justice and Imagined Communities.Schwartz‐Marin Ernesto - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (4):30-31.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #872,738 of 2,449,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes