Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):177-184 (2015)

Rajesh Kumar
Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi
Misconduct in medical science research is an unfortunate reality. Science, for the most part, operates on the basis of trust. Researchers are expected to carry out their work and report their findings honestly. But, sadly, that is not how science always gets done. Reports keep surfacing from various countries about work being plagiarised, results which were doctored and data fabricated. Scientific misconduct is scourge afflicting the field of science, unfortunately with little impact in developing countries like India especially in health care services. A recent survey and a meta-analysis suggest that the few cases that do float up represents only tip of a large iceberg. This paper therefore highlights reasons for misconduct with steps that can be taken to reduce misconduct. Also the paper throws light on Indian scenario in relation to misconduct.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-014-9603-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,981
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientific Misconduct in India: Causes and Perpetuation.Pratap Patnaik - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1245-1249.
Misconduct in Science and the German Law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Scientific Integrity in Brazil.Liliane Lins & Fernando Martins Carvalho - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):283-287.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
The American Experience: Lessons Learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Research Misconduct: Why Are Definitions so Elusive?Robert Hauptman - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):443-444.
How to Blow the Whistle and Still Have a Career Afterwards.C. K. Gunsalus - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):51-64.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #626,890 of 2,427,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #533,878 of 2,427,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes