son preference and intimate partner violence victimization in India: examining the role of actual and desired family composition
Journal of Biosocial Science 44 (1):43-56 (2012)
AbstractSummarySon preference has been considered as a determinant of women's risk of intimate partner violence experience in India, although quantitative evidence from large nationally representative studies testing this relationship is limited. This study examines the association between husband's son preference, sex composition of children and risk of physical and sexual IPV victimization among wives. Information was collected for 26,284 couples in the nationally representative 2005–2006 National Family Health Survey of India. The exposures were husband's son preference measured as husband's desire for one or more sons greater than the number of daughters and sex composition of the household: only sons, only daughters and mixed. Outcome included past year physical and/or sexual IPV. The results showed that husband's reported son preference and sex composition of children were not associated with risk for IPV victimization in the models adjusted for socio-demographic factors. The findings from this first population-based study of socio-cultural norms around son preference and married Indian women's risk for IPV victimization indicate that cultural preference for sons does not influence women's risk for IPV victimization.
Similar books and articles
Relations Among Perceived Intimate Partner Acceptance, Remembered Parental Acceptance, and Psychological Adjustment Among Young Adults in India.Parminder Parmar & Ronald P. Rohner - 2005 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 33 (3):402-413.
Parts Generate the Whole but They Are Not Identical to It.Ross P. Cameron - 2014 - In Aaron J. Cotnoir & Donald L. M. Baxter (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press.
Obstetricians and Violence Against Women.Sonya Charles - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):51-56.
Risk Assessment and the Duty to Protect in Cases Involving Intimate Partner Violence.Alan Rosenbaum & Lynn S. Dowd - 2009 - In James L. Werth, Elizabeth Reynolds Welfel & G. Andrew H. Benjamin (eds.), The Duty to Protect: Ethical, Legal, and Professional Considerations for Mental Health Professionals. American Psychological Association.
Contextualizing Women's Violence and Aggression: Beyond Denial and Demonization.Meda Chesney-Lind - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):222-223.
Feminist Challenges to the New Familialism: Lifestyle Experimentation and the Freedom of Intimate Association.Karen Struening - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (1):135 - 154.
Ethical and Legal Dilemmas in the Management of Family Violence.Richard Bourne - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):261 – 271.
Special Section: Editor's Note: Ethical and Legal Dilemmas in the Management of Family Violence.Richard Bourne - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (3):261 – 271.
Issues Facing Native American and Alaska Native Women Living with Domestic Violence.Debra A. Tolliver - manuscript
A New Semantical Approach to the Logic of Preference.Sven Ove Hansson - 1989 - Erkenntnis 31 (1):1 - 42.
David M. Estlund and Martha C. Nussbaum, Eds., Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature:Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature. [REVIEW]Susan Dwyer - 1998 - Ethics 109 (1):184-187.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads