Bioethics 25 (1):9-20 (2011)
AbstractIn research ethics there is a canon regarding what ethical rules ought to be followed by investigators vis-à-vis their treatment of subjects and a canon regarding what fundamental ethical principles apply to the endeavor. What I aim to demonstrate here is that several of the rules find no support in the principles. This leaves anyone who would insist that we not abandon those rules in the difficult position of needing to establish that we are nevertheless justified in believing in the validity of the rules. I conclude by arguing that this is not likely to be accomplished.The rules I call into question are the rules requiring:– that studies be designed in a scientifically valid way– that risks to subjects be minimized– that subjects be afforded post-trial access to experimental interventions– that inducements paid to subjects not be counted as a benefit to them– that inducements paid to subjects not be ‘undue’– that subjects must remain free to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason without penaltyBoth canons, the canon on principles and the canon on rules, are found in the overlap among ethical pronouncements that are themselves canonical: the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, CIOMS's International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects, and NBAC's 2001 report, Ethical Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Introducción al problema de la continuidad del tratamiento beneficioso para los sujetos de investigación.Ignacio Mastroleo - 2015 - In Jorge Alberto Álvarez Díaz (ed.), Ensayos sobre ética de la salud. Ciudad de México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Unidad Xochimilco. pp. 67 - 99.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Case for Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Benjamin Sachs - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):1-3.
Similar books and articles
Universal Ethical Principles in a Diverse Universe: A Commentary on Monshi and Zieglmayer's Case Study.James M. DuBois - 2004 - Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):313 – 319.
The Exceptional Ethics of the Investigator-Subject Relationship.B. Sachs - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1):64-80.
Ethical Principles Vs. Ethical Rules: The Moderating Effect of Moral Development on Audit Independence Judgments.Terri L. Herron & David L. Gilbertson - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):499-523.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
18 Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Research.Robert J. Gatchel, Perry N. Fuchs & Colin Allen - 2006 - In B. L. Gant & M. E. Schatman (eds.), Ethical Issues in Chronic Pain Management. pp. 295.
Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?Ari VanderWalde & Seth Kurzban - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):543-558.
Human and Animal Research Guidelines: Aligning Ethical Constructs with New Scientific Developments.Hope Ferdowsian - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (8):472-478.
The Case for Evidence-Based Rulemaking in Human Subjects Research.Benjamin Sachs - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):3-13.