Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):67-84 (2014)

Authors
David Sackris
Arapahoe Community College
Abstract
Kai von Fintel and Anthony Gillies have proposed a revised contextual analysis of sentences that make use of “might” epistemically. On their view, when a speaker uses an epistemic modal term, several propositions are made available to his conversational partners and, as a result, there are several propositions that may be picked up on by those partners. Because there is no concrete “context of utterance,” there is no one proposition that the speaker could be said to have asserted. This is meant to resolve conflicting truth evaluations by different speakers of a single utterance. I argue that the position is unworkable for two reasons: First, on their view there is no single proposition that counts as being asserted or semantically expressed by a “might” utterance; this has several counterintuitive consequences. Second, their position does not address several of the original problems that led many to abandon a contextual account.
Keywords philosophy of language  contextualism  epistemic modals
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1897-1652
DOI 10.5840/pjphil2014815
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tu Wan's Stone Catalogue of Cloudy Forest.Sherman E. Lee - 1962 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 21 (2):217-217.
Cloudy Crystal Balls Do Not “Gray” Babies Make.Anita Silvers & Leslie Francis - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):36 - 38.
When Our Eyes Are Closed, What, If Anything, Do We Visually Experience?Eric Schwitzgebel - 2009 - Draft Available on Author's Homepage; Final Version in 2011 Monograph.
Spinoza's Epistemological Views.J. J. MacIntosh - 1971 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 5:28-48.
Does Popper Explain Historical Explanation?Kenneth Minogue - 1995 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:225-240.
The Picturability of Micro-Entities.Stephen J. Noren - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):234-241.
Liquid/Cloudy/Foggy: For a Critique of Fluid Textuality.Massimo Riva - 2012 - Humanist Studies and the Digital Age 2 (1):91-98.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
34 ( #337,323 of 2,519,278 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,278 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes