Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):113–130 (2006)
In what follows I will address Kant’s concerns in the First Analogy and in the Refutation of Idealism. Because the two discussions have a similar trajectory, it is of interest to identify some of the differences between them. As we will see, the manifest differences are indicative of more significant underlying differences, regarding two ways of construing transcendental proofs.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defense of Kant's Refutation of Berkeley.Vance G. Morgan - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):217-237.
Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate.Dennis Schulting - 2010 - In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Kant on Analogy.John J. Callanan - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):747 – 772.
Kant's Refutation of Idealism and Fourth Paralogism: A Response to Vogel.John Davenport - manuscript
Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy.Lucy Allais - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
Turning the Game Against the Idealist: Mendelssohn's Refutation of Idealism and Kant's Replies.Corey W. Dyck - 2011 - In R. W. Munk (ed.), Mendelssohn's Aesthetics and Metaphysics.
Kant's Refutation of Idealism: A Reply to Chignell.Georges Dicker - 2011 - Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):175-183.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads106 ( #45,639 of 2,154,175 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #60,673 of 2,154,175 )
How can I increase my downloads?