The acknowledgement of transcendence: Anti-theodicy in Adorno and Levinas

Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294 (2011)
Abstract
It is generally recognized that Adorno and Levinas should both be read as urging a rethinking of ethics in light of Auschwitz. This demand should be understood in terms of the acknowledgement of transcendence. A phenomenological account of the event of Auschwitz developed by Todes motivates my use of Cavell’s distinction between acknowledgement and knowledge. Both Levinas and Adorno argue that an ethically adequate acknowledgement of transcendence requires that the traditional concept of transcendence as represented in theodicy must be rejected. This rejection takes the form of a rejection of theodicy (Levinas) and a negative theodicy (Adorno). I argue that Adorno’s response is superior because it is a response to the specificity and particularity of the event of Auschwitz as the destruction of, rather than merely the denial of, the humanity of both perpetrators and victims
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453710389438
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind and World.Huw Price & John McDowell - 1994 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):169-181.
Must We Mean What We Say?Stanley Cavell - 1958 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1 (1-4):172 – 212.
Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW]Nick Smith - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein Ludwig, G. E. M. Anscombe & R. Rhees - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (4):353-354.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Critique and Defence of Theodicy.Samuel Shearn - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):439-458.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Adorno and Extreme Evil.Espen Hammer - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW]Nick Smith - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
No Exit: Levinas' Aporetic Account of Transcendence.Robert Bernasconi - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence.Kris Sealey - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.
Added to PP index
2011-03-25

Total downloads
27 ( #206,314 of 2,211,068 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #380,765 of 2,211,068 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature