The acknowledgement of transcendence: Anti-theodicy in Adorno and Levinas

Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294 (2011)
It is generally recognized that Adorno and Levinas should both be read as urging a rethinking of ethics in light of Auschwitz. This demand should be understood in terms of the acknowledgement of transcendence. A phenomenological account of the event of Auschwitz developed by Todes motivates my use of Cavell’s distinction between acknowledgement and knowledge. Both Levinas and Adorno argue that an ethically adequate acknowledgement of transcendence requires that the traditional concept of transcendence as represented in theodicy must be rejected. This rejection takes the form of a rejection of theodicy (Levinas) and a negative theodicy (Adorno). I argue that Adorno’s response is superior because it is a response to the specificity and particularity of the event of Auschwitz as the destruction of, rather than merely the denial of, the humanity of both perpetrators and victims
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453710389438
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,702
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Must We Mean What We Say?Stanley Cavell - 1958 - Inquiry 1 (1-4):172 – 212.
Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW]Nick Smith - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Mind and World.Huw Price & John McDowell - 1994 - Philosophical Books 38 (3):169-181.
Transcendence and Evil.Emmanuel Levinas - 1983 - Analecta Husserliana 14:153.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Moral Critique and Defence of Theodicy.Samuel Shearn - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (4):439-458.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Adorno and Extreme Evil.Espen Hammer - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW]Nick Smith - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
No Exit: Levinas' Aporetic Account of Transcendence.Robert Bernasconi - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):101-117.
The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence.Kris Sealey - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

26 ( #194,078 of 2,158,472 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,472 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums