Can the amorlist only be ‘right’?: A closer look at the inverted commas argument

Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (1):113-122 (2000)

Brook Sadler
University of South Florida
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI swphilreview200017114
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,669
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Using Inverted Commas.Leonard Linsky - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):208-209.
Review: Leonard Linsky, On Using Inverted Commas. [REVIEW]Alonzo Church - 1951 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):208-209.
Wittgenstein and Qualia.Ned Block - 2007 - Philosophical Perspectives 21 (1):73-115.
Wittgenstein on Persons and Human Beings.Jenny Teichman - 1973 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 7:133-148.
Wittgenstein on Persons and Human Beings: Jenny Teichman.Jenny Teichman - 1973 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 7:133-148.
The Inverted Colour Space of Vampires.Karel Kranda - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):959-959.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,007,929 of 2,327,469 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #542,080 of 2,327,469 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature