Targeting Human Shields

Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):328-348 (2018)

Authors
Amir Saemi
Institute For Research In Fundamental Sciences (IPM)
Philip Atkins
Temple University
Abstract
In this paper, we are concerned with the morality of killing human shields. Many moral philosophers seem to believe that knowingly killing human shields necessarily involves intentionally targeting human shields. If we assume that the distinction between intention and foresight is morally significant, then this view would entail that it is generally harder to justify a military operation in which human shields are knowingly killed than a military operation in which the same number of casualties result as a merely foreseen side effect. We argue, however, that only some cases of knowingly killing human shields should be regarded as intentionally targeting human shields, and thus only those cases face higher bars of justification. We shall formulate different principles that help us to distinguish between cases where a military operation involves the deliberate harming of human shields and cases where it does not. As we shall see, these principles are relevant in scenarios that are all too realistic and common, such as the bombing of legitimate military targets located amid civilian populations.
Keywords human shields  killing in war  terrorism  intention  foresight  doctrine of double effect  direct harmful agency  the Gaza conflict
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/pq/pqx049
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,433
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Killing in Self‐Defense.Jonathan Quong - 2009 - Ethics 119 (3):507-537.
The Ethics of Killing.Jeff Mcmahan - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):477-490.
Wrongful Intentions Without Closeness.Victor Tadros - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (1):52-74.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deconstructing the Doctrine of Double Effect.Richard Hull - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):195-207.
Aristotle.Christopher Shields - 2007 - Routledge.
Killing and Allowing to Die.Daniel Patrick Sulmasy - 1995 - Dissertation, Georgetown University
Human Shields.Banu Bargu - 2013 - Contemporary Political Theory 12 (4):277-295.
A Defense of St. Thomas and the Principle of Double Effect.Daniel F. Montaldi - 1986 - Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):296 - 332.
Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
What Is So Wrong with Killing People?Robert Young - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (210):515-528.
Killing Innocents and the Doctrine of Double Effect.John Zeis - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:133-144.
II—Christopher Shields: The Peculiar Motion of Aristotelian Souls.Christopher Shields - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):139-161.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-23

Total views
37 ( #221,891 of 2,255,390 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #238,464 of 2,255,390 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature