Christological Perichoresis

Open Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):552-559 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I reclaim the patristic Christological use of perichoresis, by showing how in bringing together different entities, such as God and Nature, and looking at them in unity as the one person of Christ, we can acknowledge the perichoresis between divine and human, divine and nature. Christological perichoresis supports the idea that the whole creation is included in God’s recreated cosmos, in response to the redeeming power of Christ who entered the web of life as a creature. The Christological reading of perichoresis can be an original contribution which supports my ecofeminist Christian view. Christological perichoresis, as the divine form of contextualization, can enable us to follow Christ’s steps to contextualize by taking our own contexts seriously. Human contextualization can only be a witness of divine contextualization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,244

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
22 (#817,658)

6 months
5 (#1,294,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

God in patristic thought.George Leonard Prestige - 1936 - Toronto,: W. Heinemann. Edited by F. L. Cross.
God in Creation.Jürgen Moltmann - 1989 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25 (2):127-128.
God in Patristic Thought.G. L. Prestige - 1958 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 20 (1):139-139.

Add more references