Rejoinder To S A Rasmussen's Sainsbury On A Fregean Argument

Analysis 44 (June):111-113 (1984)

Authors
Mark Sainsbury
University of Texas at Austin
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,548
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sainsbury on a Fregean Argument.Stig Alstrup Rasmussen - 1984 - Analysis 44 (3):106 - 111.
Rejoinder to Rasmussen.R. M. Sainsbury - 1984 - Analysis 44 (3):111 - 113.
Paderewski Variations.R. Mark Sainsbury - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (4):483-502.
This is Nonsense.Gregor Damschen - 2008 - The Reasoner 2 (10):6-8.
On the PROVER9 Ontological Argument.T. Parent - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (2):475-483.
Proper Names and Practices: On Reference Without Referents.Mark Textor - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):105-118.
Arguing for Frege's Fundamental Principle.Bryan Frances - 1998 - Mind and Language 13 (3):341–346.
Names, Fictional Names, and 'Really'.R. M. Sainsbury - 1999 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):243–269.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-04

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes