Review: Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margin for Error [Book Review]

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589 - 601 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Review of Williamson: Vagueness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vagueness, ignorance, and Margin for error. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589-601.
Vagueness and Margin for error principles.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):107-125.
An anti-epistemicist consequence of Margin for error semantics for knowledge.Delia Graff Fara - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):127-142.
Varieties of vagueness.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):145-157.
Is vagueness Sui generis ?David Barnett - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5 – 34.
Williamson on inexact knowledge.Anna Mahtani - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):171 - 180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
101 (#168,438)

6 months
2 (#1,263,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Sainsbury
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

There Is No Knowledge From Falsehood.Ian Schnee - 2015 - Episteme 12 (1):53-74.
Centrality and marginalisation.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):517-533.
Assertion, knowledge, and action.Ishani Maitra & Brian Weatherson - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (1):99-118.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references