Abduction in argumentation frameworks

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):218-239 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper studies abduction in abstract argumentation frameworks. Given an argument, an agent verifies whether the argument is justified or not in its argumentation framework. If the argument is not justified in the argumentation framework, the agent seeks conditions to explain the justification state by hypothesising arguments in the universal argumentation framework. We formulate such abductive reasoning in argumentation semantics and provide its computation in logic programming. We also apply abduction to enforcement and simple dialogue games in argumentation frameworks.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,335

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argumentation with justified preferences.Sung-Jun Pyon - forthcoming - Argument and Computation:1-46.
Sequent-based logical argumentation.Ofer Arieli & Christian Straßer - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (1):73-99.
準無矛盾論理に基づく議論フレームワーク.高橋 武久 梅田 勇一 - 2004 - Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 19:83-94.
Initial sets in abstract argumentation frameworks.Yuming Xu & Claudette Cayrol - 2018 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28 (2-3):260-279.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-26

Downloads
56 (#304,848)

6 months
29 (#130,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?