Journal of Indian Philosophy 46 (3):419-436 (2018)

Authors
Masamichi Sakai
Kansai University
Abstract
The concept of contingency is very much debated. In this paper, I’ll offer a novel interpretation of it in Dharmakīrti’s ontology, focusing on his treatment and understanding of vināśa which is, according to Dharmakīrti, not contingent and thus occurs necessarily to everything. I will do so by clarifying some important terms, motivating and explaining Dharmakīrti’s position, and analyzing firsthand some Dharmakīrtian debate excerpts with Nyāya and/or Vaiśeṣika philosophers as the main opponents. In the course of this, I will show that basically, for Dharmakīrti, contingency is tantamount to dependency, whereas Nyāya and/or Vaiśeṣika authors, e.g., Śrīdhara and Bhāsarvajña, claim that something can be dependent on something else and still be necessary.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-018-9348-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,289
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Tradition and Reflection: Explorations in Indian Thought.J. L. Brockington & Wilhelm Halbfass - 1992 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 112 (3):545.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Relative Chronology of Dharmakīrti and Samantabhadra.Piotr Balcerowicz - 2016 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 44 (3):437-483.
Dharmakirti on Compassion and Rebirth.Eli Franco, Dharmakirti & Prajñakaragupta - 1997 - Arbeitskreis Für Tibetische Und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.
Dharmakīrti’s Criticism of Anityatva in the Sāṅkhya Theory.Toshikazu Watanabe - 2011 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):553-569.
A "Restricted" Interpretation of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy. [REVIEW]Christian Coseru - 2006 - H-Net Reviews in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Dharmakirti and Priest on Change.Chris Mortensen - 2004 - Philosophy East and West 54 (1):20-28.
Svarthanumana-Pariccheda = Svarthanumana-Pariccheda.Dalsukh Bhai Dharmakirti & Malvania - 1959 - Hindu Vishvavidyalaya Sanskrit Publications Board Banaras Hindu University, Sole Distributor.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-01-25

Total views
12 ( #781,070 of 2,445,034 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,173 of 2,445,034 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes