An Engaged Buddhist Response to John Rawls's "The Law of Peoples"

Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (4):637 - 661 (2006)

In "The Law of Peoples", John Rawls proposes a set of principles for international relations, his "Law of Peoples." He calls this Law a "realistic utopia," and invites consideration of this Law from the perspectives of non-Western cultures. This paper considers Rawls's Law from the perspective of Engaged Buddhism, the contemporary form of socially and politically activist Buddhism. We find that Engaged Buddhists would be largely in sympathy with Rawls's proposals. There are differences, however: Rawls builds his view from the idea of independent nation--states, while the Buddhists see the world more in terms of a single humankind, the members being highly interdependent with one another, and also with the physical world. The Buddhists would also push harder than Rawls for global structures building multilateralism, restrict more severely justifications for war and behavior in war, stress economic justice more heavily, and insist on all the human rights in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Keywords Engaged Buddhism  international law  globalization  human rights  John Rawls  multiculturalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00288.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,759
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Being Peace.Thich Nhat Hanh - 1986 - The Acorn 1 (1):10-12.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #235,014 of 2,264,820 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #363,397 of 2,264,820 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature