Against S5: Impossible Worlds in the Logic of What Might Have Been

Abstract

The dogma that the propositional logic of metaphysical modality is S5 is rebutted in related installments (previously published and unpublished essays).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Logic of What Might Have Been.Nathan Salmon - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (1):3-34.
Modal Combinatorialism is Consistent with S5.Henry Taylor - 2019 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):23-32.
Two Modal Paradoxes and Their Solutions.Jun Ren - 1994 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Can Hardcore Actualism Validate S5?Samuel Kimpton-Nye - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2):342-358.
The transience of possibility.Reina Hayaki - 2005 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (2):25-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-19

Downloads
308 (#81,171)

6 months
109 (#51,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Salmón
University of California, Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essence and modality.Kit Fine - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8 (Logic and Language):1-16.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.
Modality and Explanatory Reasoning.Boris Christian Kment - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 54 references / Add more references