Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard [Book Review]

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198 (2012)

Abstract
This article critically examines, and ultimately rejects, the best interest standard as the predominant, go-to ethical and legal standard of decision making for children. After an introduction to the presumption of parental authority, it characterizes and distinguishes six versions of the best interest standard according to two key dimensions related to the types of interests emphasized. Then the article brings three main criticisms against the best interest standard: (1) that it is ill-defined and inconsistently appealed to and applied, (2) that it is unreasonably demanding and narrow, and (3) that it fails to respect the family. Finally, it argues that despite the best interest standard’s potent rhetorical power, it is irreparably encumbered by too much inconsistency and confusion and should be rejected
Keywords Pediatric decision making  Best interest standard  Surrogate decision making
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11017-012-9219-z
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,728
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1966 - Philosophical Quarterly 16 (65):365.
A Theory of Human Motivation.A. H. Maslow - 1943 - Psychological Review 50 (4):370-396.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Living Wills and Substituted Judgments: A Critical Analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.
In Re Edna MF: Case Law Confusion in Surrogate Decision Making.Robyn S. Shapiro - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):45-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
40 ( #209,657 of 2,264,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #452,972 of 2,264,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature