Is de re belief reducible to de dicto?
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (sup1):85-110 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
DOI
10.1080/00455091.1997.10715963
My notes
Similar books and articles
Stich againstde dicto‐de reambiguity.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - Philosophical Psychology 2 (2):223-230.
A Simple Solution to the Problem of De Se Belief Ascriptions.Ari Maunu - 2000 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 33 (3-4):199-226.
Contradictions, Objects, and Belief.Srećko Kovač - 2007 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. pp. 417.
A Problem with De Re Belief Ascriptions, with a Consequence to Substitutivity.Ari Maunu - 2002 - Philosophia 29 (1-4):411-421.
Emedded Questions and 'De Dicto' Readings.Yael Sharvit - 2002 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (2):97-123.
Egocentric Omniscience and Self-Ascriptive Belief.Brian Macpherson - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:125-140.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-30
Downloads
86 (#144,531)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
2014-03-30
Downloads
86 (#144,531)
6 months
1 (#455,463)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Quantifiers and propositional attitudes: Quine revisited.Sean Crawford - 2008 - Synthese 160 (1):75 - 96.
Is Genuine Satisficing Rational?Edmund Henden - 2007 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):339-352.
Singular thoughts, singular attitude reports, and acquaintance.Jeonggyu Lee - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
References found in this work
Opacity.David Kaplan - 1986 - In Lewis Edwin Hahn & Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. Open Court. pp. 229-289.