Mind 127 (507):691-728 (2018)

Authors
Bernhard Salow
Oxford University
Abstract
Suppose you’d like to believe that p, whether or not it’s true. What can you do to help? A natural initial thought is that you could engage in Intentionally Biased Inquiry : you could look into whether p, but do so in a way that you expect to predominantly yield evidence in favour of p. This paper hopes to do two things. The first is to argue that this initial thought is mistaken: intentionally biased inquiry is impossible. The second is to show that reflections on intentionally biased inquiry strongly support a controversial ‘access’ principle which states that, for all p, if p is part of our evidence, then that p is part of our evidence is itself part of our evidence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/fzw029
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,308
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Action.John Hawthorne & Jason Stanley - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):571-590.
What is Justified Belief.Alvin Goldman - 1979 - In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. pp. 1-25.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.

View all 55 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence: A Guide for the Uncertain.Kevin Dorst - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (3):586-632.
Abominable KK Failures.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1227-1259.
Diachronic Dutch Books and Evidential Import.J. Dmitri Gallow - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):49-80.
Elusive Externalism.Bernhard Salow - 2019 - Mind 128 (510):397-427.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Skepticism and Externalist Theories of Thought Content.Kirk Alan Ludwig - 1990 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Intentions and the Reasons for Which We Act.Ulrike Heuer - 2014 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (3pt3):291-315.
A Theory of Evidence for Evidence-Based Policy.Nancy Cartwright & Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - In Philip Dawid, William Twining & Mimi Vasilaki (eds.), Evidence, Inference and Enquiry. Oup/British Academy. pp. 291.
Acting Intentionally and Acting for a Reason.Maria Alvarez - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):293-305.
Oracles, Aesthetics, and Bayesian Consensus.Jeffrey A. Barrett - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (Supplement):273-280.
Phenomenal Evidence and Factive Evidence.Susanna Schellenberg - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):875-896.
Belief is Involuntary.René van Woudenberg - 2012 - Discipline Filosofiche 22 (2):111-131.
No Evidence is False.Clayton Littlejohn - 2013 - Acta Analytica 28 (2):145-159.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-25

Total views
124 ( #71,309 of 2,326,038 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #25,265 of 2,326,038 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes