Springer Verlag (2016)

What kind of reality is legal reality, how is it created, and what are its a priori foundations? These are the central questions asked by the early phenomenologists who took interest in social ontology and law. While Reinach represents the well-known “realist” approach to phenomenology of law, Felix Kaufmann and Fritz Schreier belonged to the “positivist” “Vienna School of Jurisprudence,” combining Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law with Edmund Husserl’s phenomenology—and thereby challenging Reinach’s views on how legal reality and the legal a priori were to be conceived. This paper addresses the controversy between these positivist and realist approaches to phenomenology of law, with the goal of introducing the lesser known theories of Kaufmann and Schreier. The special focus on their critique of Reinach’s outline should give us an overview of their positions vis-à-vis the basic and a priori elements of which legal reality consists and the role that phenomenology plays in analyzing them. There is one general tendency to be noted: While the phenomenological legal positivists see the root of legal reality in an act of interpretation according to a “normative scheme of interpretation,” Reinach locates the roots of legal reality in social interaction and argues for the existence of entities independent of any interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9783319276915
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Collective Intentionality.David P. Schweikard & Hans Bernhard Schmid - 2012 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Feeling togetherness online: a phenomenological sketch of online communal experiences.Lucy Osler - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 19 (3):569-588.
Alfred Schutz.Michael Barber - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Social Ontology as Embedded in the Tradition of Phenomenological Realism.Alessandro Salice - 2013 - In Michael Schmitz, Beatrice Kobow & Hans Bernhard Schmid (eds.), The Background of Social Reality. Springer. pp. 217--232.
Social Phenomenology in the Study of Human Self.Natalia Smirnova - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:85-92.
The Phenomenological Approach in Social Science.Hans P. Neisser - 1959 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (2):198-212.
Psychology's Reality Debate: A "Levels of Reality" Approach.Jack Martin & Jeff Sugarman - 1999 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 19 (2):177-194.
Social Reality.Finn Collin - 1997 - Routledge.
Early Heidegger on Social Reality.Jo-Jo Koo - 2016 - In Alessandro Salice & Hans Bernhard Schmid (eds.), The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality. Springer Verlag. pp. 91-119.
Social Reality.Finn Collin - 1997 - Routledge.
Phenomenology and Social Reality: Essays in Memory of Alfred Schutz.Maurice Natanson - 1972 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (1):117-118.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,019,249 of 2,432,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,136 of 2,432,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes