Rationality and psychology

In Piers Rawling & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 279-300 (2004)

Authors
Stephen Stich
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Richard Samuels
Ohio State University
Abstract
Samuels and Stich explore the debate over the extent to which ordinary human reasoning and decision making is rational. One prominent cluster of views, often associated with the heuristics and biases tradition in psychology, maintains that human reasoning is, in important respects, normatively problematic or irrational. Samuels and Stich start by sketching some key experimental findings from this tradition and describe a range of pessimistic claims about the rationality of ordinary people that these and related findings are sometimes taken to support. Such pessimistic interpretations of the experimental findings have not gone unchallenged however: Samuels and Stich outline some of the research on reasoning that has been done by evolutionary psychologists and sketch a cluster of more optimistic theses about ordinary reasoning that such psychologists defend. Although Samuels and Stich think that the most dire pronouncements made by writers in the heuristics and biases tradition are unwarranted, they also maintain that the situation is rather more pessimistic than sometimes suggested by evolutionary psychologists. They conclude by defending this “middle way” and sketch a family of “dual processing” theories of reasoning which, they argue, offer some support for the moderate interpretation they advocate.
Keywords Psychology  Rationality  Reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1093/0195145399.003.0015
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,984
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemic Trespassing.Nathan Ballantyne - forthcoming - Mind:fzx042.
Rationality Disputes – Psychology and Epistemology.Patrick Rysiew - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1153-1176.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Common Sense, Reasoning, & Rationality.Renee Elio (ed.) - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Reason and Rationality.Richard Samuels, Stephen Stich & Luc Faucher - 2004 - In M. Sintonen, J. Wolenski & I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Handbook of Epistemology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1-50.
Rationality Disputes – Psychology and Epistemology.Patrick Rysiew - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1153-1176.
The Rationality of Evolutionary Psychology.David E. Over - 2002 - In Jose Luis Bermudez & Alan Millar (eds.), Reason and Nature. Clarendon Press. pp. 187--207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
214 ( #27,376 of 2,319,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #73,672 of 2,319,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature