Jurisprudence 3 (1):13-35 (2012)

Authors
Irit Samet
King's College London
Abstract
The paper argues that there are good reasons to frame the categories of equitable liability around the concept of conscience. A quick look at recent case law reveals an increasing use of conscience categories to discourage overly selfish behaviour among parties to commercial relationships. Critics discard 'conscionability' as an empty category of reference, or see it as a dangerously subjective point of reference. I want to show that the critics assume a very specific, and controversial, model of conscience in which it is a mere subjective psychological disposition to follow one's hunch about right and wrong. Instead, conscionability should be interpreted in accordance with the Kantian objectivist model, as referring to the point of convergence between people's motivation to do good and their commitment to objective moral norms. On this model, conscience has a strong public aspect as the reasons on which it operates apply to all reasonable human beings at all times.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.5235/204033212800793970
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,401
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Authority, Law and Morality.Joseph Raz - 1985 - The Monist 68 (3):295-324.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Conscience Principle.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Are the Judgments of Conscience Unreasonable?Edward Andrew & Peter Lindsay - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (2):235-254.
What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
The Enlightenment: Conscience and Authority in Judgment. [REVIEW]Wenyu Xie - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):264-281.
The Normative Significance of Conscience.Kyle Swan & Kevin Vallier - 2012 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (3):1-21.
The Ascendant Liberal Conscience: A Response to Three Critics.Lucas Swaine - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):521-529.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-08

Total views
22 ( #490,970 of 2,445,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,040 of 2,445,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes