An aretaic objection to agricultural biotechnology

Abstract
Considerations of virtue and character appear from time to time in the agricultural biotechnology literature. Critics of the technologies often suggest that they are contrary to some virtue (usually humility) or do not fit with the image of ourselves and the human place in the world that we ought to embrace. In this article, I consider the aretaic or virtue-based objection that to engage in agricultural biotechnology is to exhibit arrogance, hubris, and disaffection. In section one, I discuss Gary Comstock's treatment of this objection. In section two, I provide an alternative interpretation of the objection that more accurately reflects the concerns of those who offer the criticism than does Comstock's standard interpretation. In sections three and four, I assess the objection. I argue that despite its merits, the objection does not justify global opposition to agricultural biotechnology. Instead, it favors a limited endorsement position not unlike the one defended by Comstock.
Keywords agricultural biotechnology  aretaic objection  Gary Comstock  humility  limited endorsement  virtue ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000033078.05859.08
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Are Scientists Right and Non-Scientists Wrong? Reflections on Discussions of GM.Jan Deckers - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (5):451-478.
Modern Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Ethics.Per Sandin & Payam Moula - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):803-806.
GM Crops, the Hubris Argument and the Nature of Agriculture.Payam Moula - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):161-177.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Our Vision for the Agricultural Sciences Need Not Include Biotechnology.Wes Jackson - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):207-215.
Our Vision for the Agricultural Sciences Needs to Include Biotechnology.Donald N. Duvick - 1991 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (2):200-206.
Biotechnology and Global Justice.Tony Smith - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
The Technological Fix Criticisms and the Agricultural Biotechnology Debate.Dane Scott - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):207-226.
The Magic Bullet Criticism of Agricultural Biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

9 ( #466,268 of 2,177,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #317,698 of 2,177,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums