Constraining production theories: Principled motivation, consistency, homunculi, underspecification, failed predictions, and contrary data
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):55-56 (1999)
AbstractDespite several positive features, such as extensive theoretical and empirical scope, aspects of Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer 's theory can be challenged on theoretical grounds and empirical grounds
Similar books and articles
Decontextualised data IN, decontextualised theory OUT.Benjamin Roberts, Mike Kalish, Kathryn Hird & Kim Kirsner - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):54-55.
Why Friedman's methodology did not generate consensus among economists?David Teira - 2009 - Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (2):201-214.
Feedback consistency effects.Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
Neural plausibility and validation may not be so e-z.Sara C. Sereno, Patrick J. O'Donnell & Anne B. Sereno - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):502-502.
A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Anthony Greenwald - manuscript
When good theories make bad predictions.Vadim Batitsky & Zoltan Domotor - 2007 - Synthese 157 (1):79 - 103.
Interpretive praxis and theory-networks.L. E. E. Sangwon - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):213–230.
Underspecification of Cognitive Status in Reference Production: Some Empirical Predictions.Jeanette K. Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski - 2012 - Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (2):249-268.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads