Evolution, cognition and argumentation

Abstract

Sperber and Mercier maintain that argumentation is a meta-representational module. In their evolutionary view of argumentation, the function of this module would be to regulate the flow of information between interlocutors through persuasiveness on the side of the communicator and epistemic vigilance on the side of the audience. The aim of this paper is to discuss this definition of argumen-tation by analyzing what they mean by “communicator’s persuasiveness” and “audience epistemic vigilance”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition.Keith Frankish - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):79-80.
Metaphors and Argumentation.Cristian Santibanez Yanez - 2007 - Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Biennial Conference 7.
Manipulations in argumentation.Zinaida Z. Ilatov - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):359-367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
13 (#984,455)

6 months
5 (#565,734)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael A. Gilbert
York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The origin of concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.Trudy Govier - 2018 - Windsor: University of Windsor.

View all 18 references / Add more references